Key takeaways
- Your child has been doing science since they first asked "why?" — curriculum should channel that curiosity, not extinguish it
- Homeschooled students score 15-30 percentile points higher on standardized tests than public school peers, including science[1]
- You do not need a science background to teach science — many curricula are designed to teach the parent alongside the student
- The secular vs. faith-based decision matters early: switching worldviews mid-curriculum creates confusion and frustration
Your child was born a scientist. Watch any toddler for ten minutes and you'll see the scientific method in action: hypothesis ("what happens if I drop this?"), experimentation (drops it), observation (watches it fall), and replication (drops it forty-seven more times). That relentless curiosity—the endless "why" and "how come" and "what if"—is the raw material of scientific thinking.
Somewhere between preschool and high school, many kids lose that spark. Science becomes a subject to survive rather than a way of understanding the world. The good news: homeschooling gives you the chance to keep that flame alive. The challenge: with hundreds of science curricula promising to make learning "come alive," choosing the right one feels overwhelming.
This guide cuts through the noise. We'll cover the major approaches to teaching science at home, give you honest assessments of the most popular programs, and help you navigate the practical realities—from kitchen-table experiments to high school lab requirements. Whether you're looking for hands-on kits, video instruction, or living books, you'll find a path forward that fits your family.
The Worldview Question: Address It First
Before comparing experiment kits or reading curricula reviews, you need to settle the worldview question. Science curriculum is where faith and academics most directly intersect, and choosing wrong creates problems that compound over time.
Faith-based curricula teach science through a religious lens, typically young-earth creationism for Christian programs. These curricula present biblical perspectives on origins, often critique evolutionary theory, and frame scientific discovery as revealing God's design. Apologia, Master Books, and Answers in Genesis are the major players here.
Secular curricula present science without religious framing—neither affirming nor denying faith. They teach evolutionary biology, geologic time scales, and cosmological origins as the scientific consensus presents them. Real Science Odyssey, Building Foundations of Scientific Understanding, and Elemental Science fall into this category.
The middle ground exists but requires more work. Some families use secular curricula and add theological discussions at home. Others choose "worldview-neutral" programs that avoid origins topics entirely (rare but available). A growing number of Christian homeschoolers embrace evolutionary creation—accepting scientific consensus while maintaining faith—and mix resources accordingly.
The key is consistency. Switching from a young-earth curriculum to a secular one mid-stream (or vice versa) creates confusion. Make this decision early and stick with it through at least elementary school.
Worldview Options at a Glance
Hands-On vs. Textbook: Finding Your Balance
The second major divide in science curricula separates programs built around experiments from those built around reading. Most fall somewhere on the spectrum, but the emphasis varies dramatically.
Experiment-heavy programs treat hands-on activities as the core learning experience. Reading supports the experiments rather than the other way around. Kids dissect owl pellets, build circuits, grow crystals, and mix solutions. Science Unlocked, Supercharged Science, and many unit studies follow this approach. The advantage: engagement. Kids who hate textbooks often love science when it involves doing something. The disadvantage: mess, prep time, and cost for supplies.
Reading-focused programs use textbooks, living books, or video lectures as the primary instruction mode. Experiments happen, but they illustrate concepts already taught rather than driving discovery. Apologia, BJU Press, and most traditional curricula work this way. The advantage: structure and thoroughness. The disadvantage: passive learners may disengage.
The Charlotte Mason approach deserves special mention. These programs use "living books"—narrative science written by passionate authors—plus nature study, notebooking, and narration. Less structured than textbooks, more intentional than pure unschooling. Blossom and Root and Noeo Science blend this approach with hands-on elements.
Your child's learning style matters here. Kinesthetic learners need to touch, build, and experiment. Visual learners may prefer diagrams and videos. Auditory learners thrive with discussion and read-alouds. Most families land on a blend—some reading, some experiments—but knowing where to emphasize helps narrow your options.
The Major Players: Honest Program Reviews
Let's look at the science curricula that dominate homeschool conversations. For each, we'll cover what it does well, where it falls short, and who it fits best. These are honest assessments based on how programs actually perform in real homeschools—not marketing copy.
Apologia Science
The overview: The most popular Christian science curriculum, known for rigorous content written in a conversational style directly to the student. Dr. Jay Wile's Exploring Creation series covers elementary through high school with a young-earth creationist perspective.
What works: Comprehensive coverage that genuinely prepares students for college-level science. The conversational tone makes dense material more accessible. Students can work independently by middle school. The elementary "Young Explorer" series uses a Charlotte Mason approach with notebooking.
What doesn't: The rigor can be overwhelming. One mother with a graduate-level science degree reported the high school books felt "more like college-level than high school level." Multiple families describe tears and frustration, particularly with General Science and Physical Science. The depth that some families love is exactly what others find crushing.
Best for: Self-motivated students who enjoy academic challenge, families wanting college-prep rigor, parents comfortable with young-earth creationism presented strongly.
Not ideal for: Struggling learners, kids who need more hands-on engagement, families wanting a gentler approach.
Master Books
The overview: Faith-based publisher offering K-12 science from a Biblical worldview. More accessible than Apologia, with visually engaging books and a less "textbooky" feel.
What works: Gorgeous, engaging presentation that draws kids in. More manageable for families who found Apologia overwhelming. The Teacher Guides make parent preparation minimal. Affordable compared to many complete programs.
What doesn't: Less rigorous than Apologia—which is a feature or bug depending on your goals. Some families report needing to supplement for high school college prep. The worldview presentation is strong; secular families should look elsewhere.
Best for: Families wanting faith-based content without Apologia's intensity, visual learners, parents wanting open-and-go simplicity.
Not ideal for: Families seeking maximum academic rigor, secular families.
Real Science Odyssey (RSO)
The overview: Secular, hands-on curriculum covering life science, earth & space, chemistry, and physics for elementary and middle school (Levels 1 and 2). Designed specifically for homeschoolers.
What works: Consistently praised for engaging content and well-designed experiments. Flexible enough to use as-written or adapt to your schedule. Clear instructions make lab prep manageable. Students genuinely enjoy it—a recurring theme in reviews.
What doesn't: Tops out at middle school, so you'll need something else for high school. Some families find the pace slow or the content less rigorous than they wanted. Lab supplies require gathering (though nothing exotic).
Best for: Families wanting secular, hands-on science through middle school. Parents who found other programs "too textbooky." Kids who learn by doing.
Not ideal for: High school, families wanting minimal experiment prep.
Building Foundations of Scientific Understanding (BFSU)
The overview: A three-volume, parent-led science program covering grades K-8. Follows NGSS standards with an inquiry-based approach. One of the most thorough secular options available.
What works: Remarkably comprehensive and budget-friendly (under $40 for three years of content). Teaches kids to think like scientists rather than memorize facts. Excellent for building genuine scientific understanding.
What doesn't: Heavy parent preparation required. The program is entirely parent-led with no student textbooks—you're teaching from the manual, not handing something to your child. Many families love it initially but become overwhelmed by the planning demands.
Best for: Parents willing to invest significant prep time, families on tight budgets, those who want NGSS alignment.
Not ideal for: Parents needing open-and-go curriculum, families wanting independent student work.
Popular Science Curricula Compared
The Lab Question: Do You Really Need Experiments?
The number one struggle parents report with homeschool science: experiments. They're messy. They don't work. They require random supplies you don't have. The temptation to skip them entirely is real.
Here's the honest answer: for elementary and most of middle school, you can teach science without formal labs and your child will be fine. Reading about volcanoes, watching videos of eruptions, and discussing plate tectonics teaches the same core concepts as the baking soda experiment—arguably better, since real volcanoes don't run on vinegar.
High school changes the calculation. Most colleges expect at least one lab science on transcripts, and many expect two or three. A "lab science" typically means 30+ hours of hands-on laboratory work per course, with formal lab reports. If your student is college-bound, plan for real lab work in high school biology, chemistry, or physics.
For younger students, the question is whether experiments serve learning or just create stress. If your family enjoys hands-on activities, lean into them. If every experiment ends in frustration, consider video demonstrations, virtual labs, or the "watch and discuss" approach. The goal is scientific understanding, not checking boxes.
Practical Solutions for Lab Challenges
- Kitchen substitutions work — stovetops replace Bunsen burners, canning jars substitute for beakers, food coloring demonstrates diffusion just fine
- Libraries loan equipment — many library systems now lend microscopes, robotics kits, and other STEM supplies
- Co-ops pool resources — share expensive equipment like quality microscopes or chemistry sets among families
- Virtual labs exist — PhET simulations, NOVA Labs, and YouTube dissections cover what home labs cannot
- Dual enrollment solves high school — community college lab sciences count for both high school and college credit
Elementary Science: Keep It Simple
For grades K-5, the goal is fostering curiosity, not covering content. Young children don't need comprehensive biology courses. They need opportunities to observe, question, and discover—ideally connected to whatever already interests them.
Nature study is the Charlotte Mason secret weapon here. Regular outdoor observation teaches more science than workbooks: weather patterns become atmospheric science, garden insects become entomology, rocks become geology. Add a nature journal for recording observations and you've covered scientific methodology without a formal curriculum.
If you want more structure, choose a program that emphasizes exploration over academics. Science kits like MEL Science or KiwiCo provide guided experiments without textbook reading. Living books about scientists, animals, or natural phenomena pair well with documentaries and library books on the same topics.
The programs that generate the most frustration at this age are the ones that expect too much too soon. A first-grader doesn't need to memorize the parts of a cell. They need to look at pond water under a magnifying glass and ask what those squiggly things are.
Middle School: Building the Foundation
Middle school science serves two purposes: building knowledge foundations for high school and helping students discover what branches of science interest them. A student who hates chemistry but loves biology should know that before choosing high school courses.
Most middle schoolers benefit from a general science survey—touching on life science, earth science, physical science, and basic chemistry/physics—before specializing. Programs like Apologia's General Science or BJU's middle school sequence cover this ground. Secular options include Elemental Science and the upper levels of Real Science Odyssey.
This is also when independent work becomes realistic. A motivated seventh-grader can often complete science lessons with minimal parent involvement, especially with video-based or self-grading curricula. If your student struggles with independence, that's useful information for high school planning.
For hands-on learners, middle school is prime time for science competitions. Science Olympiad, regional science fairs, and engineering challenges engage students who find textbook learning tedious. These also look excellent on high school transcripts and college applications.
High School: Meeting Real Requirements
High school science is where stakes rise. Transcripts matter. Lab requirements exist. College admissions officers have expectations. The free-form exploration of elementary gives way to structured courses with definable credits.
Most states recommend (and many require) three to four years of high school science. A typical college-prep sequence includes biology, chemistry, and physics, with at least one designated as a "lab science" with documented laboratory hours. Competitive colleges often want to see all three plus an additional advanced course.
This is where outsourcing becomes most valuable. Homeschool co-ops with experienced science teachers, dual enrollment at community colleges, and online courses from providers like Journey Homeschool Academy or HSLDA Online Academy give students access to instruction and lab facilities beyond what most homes can provide. There's no award for the "homeschooliest homeschooler"—using outside resources for high school science is practical, not failure.
For families keeping science at home, video-based curricula help. Apologia, Science Shepherd, and Derek Owens courses include video instruction that takes the teaching burden off parents. Pair these with formal lab kits (Home Science Tools sells course-specific packages) and you can create a legitimate lab science experience at the kitchen table.
Typical High School Science Sequence
When Your Current Curriculum Is Not Working
Sometimes a curriculum just doesn't fit. The signs are clear: consistent resistance, tears during science time, information not retained, or a child who used to love learning about the natural world now dreading it. These signals deserve attention.
Before switching entirely, diagnose the problem. Is the content too hard? Too easy? Too dry? Are experiments the issue, or the reading? Is the pace wrong? Sometimes the fix is adjusting how you use the curriculum rather than replacing it entirely.
If switching makes sense, do it without guilt. Many successful homeschool families change science curricula multiple times before finding the right fit. One family shared their journey: "We started with Apologia, switched to Master Books when that felt too intense, landed on Real Science Odyssey for a few years, and now do unit studies based on whatever my son is obsessing about." That's not failure. That's responsive parenting.
The goal is a child who remains curious about how the world works. If a curriculum is killing that curiosity, the curriculum is the problem—not the child.
Science Curriculum Selection Checklist
- Settled the worldview question
Decided on faith-based, secular, or neutral approach before comparing programs
- Assessed learning style fit
Matched hands-on vs. reading emphasis to how your child actually learns
- Considered parent involvement honestly
Chosen a prep level you can realistically sustain long-term
- Checked grade coverage
Confirmed the program covers the years you need, or identified what comes next
- Budgeted for hidden costs
Factored in lab supplies, experiment materials, and consumable workbooks
- Read actual parent reviews
Sought out honest feedback from families who used the curriculum, not just marketing materials
The Bottom Line
Teaching science at home feels intimidating because many of us learned science badly—as facts to memorize rather than questions to explore. Homeschooling offers the chance to do it differently. You don't need a science degree. You need a curriculum that matches your family, realistic expectations about experiments, and permission to change course when something isn't working.
Start with the worldview decision. Then match hands-on intensity to your child's learning style and your energy for prep work. For elementary, keep things simple and curiosity-driven. For middle school, build foundations and let interests emerge. For high school, get practical about requirements and don't hesitate to outsource.
The child who asked "why" about everything at age three is still in there. The right curriculum helps that curiosity flourish rather than fade. That's the goal—not perfect test scores or impressive transcripts, but a student who still finds the natural world genuinely fascinating.
Frequently Asked Questions
Ready to simplify your homeschool?
Numa helps you track compliance, manage records, and plan your curriculum—all in one place.
Get Started with Numa

